Anti-green talk is becoming a common act of despair for a certain quality of East-European leaders who have long lost the battle for decency in politics. By piling up false and ungrounded accusations against the Green movement, [Romania’s] President Basescu is in fact publicly resigning from his duty of serving the public’s interest. Just alike a myriad of post-socialist politicians of the past two decades, he is openly betraying people’s dreams for democracy, good governance, local entrepreneurship, health and clean nature. Instead, they have been turning Romania and other countries of Central Easy Europe into dirty lawless extraction fields for the profits of multinational corporations and local oligarchs, mostly controlled by the criminal structures around the former regimes’ secret services like Securitate. It is their shady deals, non-transparent business practices, and dirty technologies exploiting the pristine natural resources of Romania and the rest of the region, that Basescu is trying to back, not the interests and prosperity of his fellow citizens. In vain! For Romanians, just like all European citizens today, have the right to protect their natural environments, and the power to stand up for it against their untrustworthy political representatives, and move on without them in a green, sustainable and equitable Europe.
Earlier this week Romania's President Basescu made the following statement, translated by Bucharest-based of environmental journalist Raul Cazan:
"You know, this is, if you wish - I do not want to offend anyone - a sort of delayed environmentalist reaction. Environmentalists were extremely vocal, in the ‘70s and ‘80s in Europe. They have lost the battle against the need for development, be it in Italy, France or Germany. Therefore they are not very strong today, because they are not very credible. We can not remain as in the eighteenth century, we can not preserve everything, because development obliges us to find solutions that will allow us, on one hand, to go forward, and on the other hand, to affect the environment as little as possible with this advancement of ours. I would say, for example, what would Italy have done if environmentalists had been successful, because the whole country of Italy is a protected monument, right? They would not have built any highway. What would have France done with its nuclear power plants? It has 80% of the energy generated by nuclear power plants. The ecologist idea is overdue and I do not exclude the possibility that environmentalists that failed in the rest of Europe to find Romania as an area in which to practise what they could not achieve in their countries. So I think things are extremely complicated, in the way we approach them now."
These events are in striking similarity to what is happening in neighbouring Bulgaria. Environmental protests against a controversial amendments to the Forestry Act lead to mass scale protests in June 2012, which then escalated by the year's end, causing the resignation of the centre-right government of Boyko Borissov in the spring of 2013 and preliminary elections. After taking a narrow win in them, a new government was formed, backed by the Bulgarian Socialist Party, the Muslim-minority based Movements of Rights and Freedoms, and nationalist-populist fraction Ataka - just to be confronted in turn by ever larger protests, as soon as it appeared to serve a shady industrial and media mogul's interest. Disillusionment from traditional political parties whose leaderships act in favour of industrial and economic interests and ignore the public ones, is common for the region of Central and Eastern Europe.